• Lamb & Frischer Law Firm, LLP

    Lamb & Frischer
    Law Firm, LLP

    Personal Injury & Employment Trial Lawyers

    At Lamb & Frischer, your legal concerns are our priority. You do not have to fight alone. We can help.

    Contact Us For a Free Consultation

Lamb & Frischer
Law Firm, LLP

Personal Injury & Employment Trial Lawyers

At Lamb & Frischer, your legal concerns are our priority. You do not have to fight alone. We can help.

Call Us Now

Fighting for justice isn’t easy.
Let us do the work.

Our time is spent on you. This is our core philosophy. Lawsuits are unique, and you need lawyers who have time to investigate your case as well as time to advise you through the process.

While the harm you suffered may be life changing, making a claim for your injuries should not consume your life. Lamb & Frischer are experienced advocates and counselors who handle your legal claim for you, so that you can move on with the rest of your life.

Contact us and learn how we are different. At Lamb & Frischer, it is paramount that clients can talk directly to their attorney, because one of the biggest state bar complaints about other firms is difficulty talking to an attorney. Therefore, at Lamb & Frischer, your claim will be evaluated by an attorney, not a team of intake staff. Our clients talk regularly with attorneys, not case managers.

We take the vast majority of our cases on contingency fees and we advance the costs of your case. In the rare event that we do not recover anything for you on a contingency fee basis, you will not owe us anything.

We Focus On You

Fighting for justice isn’t easy.
Let us do the work.

Our time is spent on you. This is our core philosophy. Lawsuits are unique, and you need lawyers who have time to investigate your case as well as time to advise you through the process.

While the harm you suffered may be life changing, making a claim for your injuries should not consume your life. Lamb & Frischer are experienced advocates and counselors who handle your legal claim for you, so that you can move on with the rest of your life.

Contact us and learn how we are different. At Lamb & Frischer, it is paramount that clients can talk directly to their attorney, because one of the biggest state bar complaints about other firms is difficulty talking to an attorney. Therefore, at Lamb & Frischer, your claim will be evaluated by an attorney, not a team of intake staff. Our clients talk regularly with attorneys, not case managers.

We take the vast majority of our cases on contingency fees and we advance the costs of your case. In the rare event that we do not recover anything for you on a contingency fee basis, you will not owe us anything.

We Focus On You

Bryan Lamb

Bryan Lamb

Partner

Representing the Plaintiff's side, measuring in at 6'2" and from the Bay Area and South Bay, Bryan is a veteran lawyer representing individuals with nearly two decades of experience under his championship belt. With countless knockouts, Bryan has focused in personal injury law his whole career and gained unique experience litigating construction injuries and other catastrophic injuries.

Rated by Super Lawyers 

Richard Frischer

Richard Frischer

Partner

In the Plaintiff's corner, measuring in at 5'6" and hailing from the Bay Area, Richard is a welter-weight litigator who gains motivation by taking on heavyweights in the ring. As a personal injury and employment law attorney primarily representing the "little guy," he is dedicated to his client's causes, righting wrongs for those treated unfairly and never tapping out.

Rated by Super Lawyers 

Areas of Specialty

We are experienced in representing people who have been injured or who have been treated unlawfully in the workplace. We primarily represent individuals bringing claims or lawsuits, and have sued defendants ranging from individuals, insurance companies, the government, and the world's largest companies. If your legal matter is not within our expertise, we can help you find an attorney.


Contact Us Today Call For Free Consultation

Personal Injury

  • Catastrophic Injuries
  • Construction Injuries
  • Wrongful Death
  • Car, Motorcycle, and Bike Collisions
  • Public Transit Accidents
  • Injuries by Dangerous Conditions of Public Property
  • Injuries by Faulty Products
    (Products Liability)
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Other Types of Injury

Employment

  • Wrongful Termination
  • Discrimination
  • Harassment
  • Denial of Leave - FMLA, and other laws giving employees the right to take leave
  • Failure to Accommodate Disability
  • Whistleblowing
  • Wage & Hour Violations
  • Other Employment Issues

Results: Verdicts & Settlements

Since Lamb & Frischer's opening in January 2013, we have obtained over $19,000,000 in judgments and settlements for our clients.



Construction Injury
Leierer v. Harris Salinas Rebar

Leierer v. Harris Salinas Rebar

  • $10,700,000.00 verdict

  • County Alameda

Selected as the Daily Journal's #1 construction injury verdict for 2015.

Mr. Leierer suffered a construction site back injury. Almost a year later, he suffered a brain injury in a solo car collision. The jury found the auto collision related to his medical care and treatment for the back injury and held subcontractor Harris Salinas Rebar accountable both injuries.

Read Full Verdict Details
Product liability
Product Liability

Product Liability

$1,500,000

Confidential product liability personal injury settlement.

Personal Injury
Personal Injury

Personal Injury

$795,000

We represented a family in a confidential wrongful death and negligent infliction of emotional distress settlement. The defendant driver struck and killed an elderly pedestrian while relatives witnessed. When we discovered the driver had impaired vision, yet still drove, the court allowed alleging punitive damages.

Elder abuse and wrongful death
Patient vs. Grancare, Parkview Healthcare, and Mariner Health Care Management

Patient vs. Grancare, Parkview Healthcare, and Mariner Health Care Management

  • Confidential Settlement
  • County Alameda

Construction Wrongful Death
Construction worker vs. Simile Construction Service

Construction worker vs. Simile Construction Service

  • $750,000
  • County Fresno

We represented the family of a drywall installer who died after falling from the defendant's scissor lift, which had its guardrail removed. We represented the worker's two young children and his mother. The defendant claimed our client fell while climbing up the side of the lift, although no one witnessed his fall.

Personal Injury Vehicle Collision
Fugitive Recovery Agent vs. Weststar Trucking

Fugitive Recovery Agent vs. Weststar Trucking

  • $450,000
  • County Stockton

We represented a good samaritan fugitive recovery agent who was rear-ended by a truck driver while assisting the driver of a broken down car. The collision happened in the early morning on Highway 99 and caused our client neck and wrist injuries.

Medical Malpractice
Confidential Medical Malpractice

Confidential Medical Malpractice

$300,000

Confidential Medical Malpractice Settlement

Uninsured Motorist and Bad Faith
Driver vs. Progressive Insurance

Driver vs. Progressive Insurance

  • $300,000
  • County San Francisco Arbitration

We represented a single mother suing her own insurance company to recover uninsured motorist benefits owed to her. She was rear-ended by an uninsured driver and suffered a lower back injury.

Personal injury vehicle collision
Driver vs. Driver

Driver vs. Driver

  • $285,000
  • County Marin

Our client, a travelling nurse, was hit when an oncoming driver made a left turn on a red light, ending her ability to physically perform travelling nurse work. The defendant blamed our client for causing the collision.

Personal injury vehicle collision
Driver vs. Driver

Driver vs. Driver

  • $250,000
  • County San Francisco

We represented a driver who was rear-ended because the defendant was using his cell phone and driving, and obtained the defendant's insurance policy limit. The San Francisco Superior Court agreed that plaintiff could request punitive damages for texting while driving, making this case one of the first texting-while-driving punitive damage cases.

Personal injury vehicle collision
Driver vs. Driver

Driver vs. Driver

  • $245,000
  • County Marin

We represented a driver who was struck by an oncoming car while turning left, causing our client shoulder and neck injuries.

Personal injury vehicle collision
Driver vs. Driver

Driver vs. Driver

  • $225,000
  • County San Francisco

Our client was rear-ended at around 5 mph. However, because she was pivoted in her seat in order to merge into traffic, she sustained a back injury that took her off of work for over a year.

Personal injury vehicle collision
Driver vs. Driver

Driver vs. Driver

  • $200,000
  • County San Joaquin

An elderly driver caused a severe collision when attempting to U-turn on a undivided highway, causing our client to suffer an open fracture of the arm. We resolved the case for the policy limits of both the elderly driver and her passenger, alleging that the passenger caused the U-turn.

Premises Liability
Renter vs. San Francisco Landlord

Renter vs. San Francisco Landlord

  • $190,000
  • County San Francisco

A staircase on our client's rental property was severely rotted and collapsed under our client's feet, causing him to fall down the stairs. Our client required shoulder surgery. The landlord contended that our client knew and complained about the collapsing stair and that contended that he had put up warning tape, which our client and witnesses denied.

Personal injury vehicle collision
Pedestrians vs. Driver

Pedestrians vs. Driver

  • $150,000
  • County San Francisco

A driver struck two clients while making a right turn on a green light, causing foot injuries to one and back injuries to the other.

Premises Liability
Pedestrian vs. City and County of San Francisco and Land Owner

Pedestrian vs. City and County of San Francisco and Land Owner

  • $127,000
  • County San Francisco

Our client, who suffered from a disability and used dual crutches, fell when his crutch went into a drain with its cover missing. Our client lost his mobility due to a shoulder injury.

Personal injury vehicle collision
Passenger vs. Driver

Passenger vs. Driver

  • $100,000
  • County San Benito

We immediately obtained the insurance policy limits for a farm worker injured when the car he was a passenger in flipped over.

Personal injury vehicle collision
Driver vs. Driver

Driver vs. Driver

  • $97,500
  • County Monterey

Our client was rear-ended at a stop sign and suffered a back injury. Defendant alleged that our client had a history of back injuries and disability, including falling while repelling from a helicopter.

Personal injury vehicle collision
Pedestrian vs. Driver

Pedestrian vs. Driver

  • $80,000
  • County Monterey

Our client was walking in a parking lot with a shopping cart when another driver struck her shopping cart. Because our client was disabled and leaning on the shopping cart, the impact injured her by twisting her body.

Dangerous condition of public property / wrongful death
Driver vs. Driver and County of Sacramento

Driver vs. Driver and County of Sacramento

  • $75,000
  • County Sacramento

Our clients' daughter was struck on the driver's side by a truck in a country road intersection. She instantly succumbed to the collision. The approach to the intersection had a poorly placed stop sign from her direction, while the cross-street had no stop sign. Plaintiffs' received the policy limits of the defendant-driver's insurance, in addition to a settlement with the County. The County continually claimed the stop sign was properly placed, however immediately after settlement, the County moved the stop sign.

Personal injury vehicle collision
Driver vs. Driver

Driver vs. Driver

  • $65,000
  • County Sonoma

Our client was injured when the defendant drove 10 mph under the speed limit and merged into the left-most lane, where our client was driving at the speed limit. The defendant claimed she had to merge left to allow a driver to pass her on the right and blamed our client for causing the collision.

Product Liabilty
Customer vs. Urban Skin Solutions

Customer vs. Urban Skin Solutions

  • $60,000
  • County Alameda

The defendant created a skin treatment that was sold to our client, which caused permanent skin discoloration.

Personal Injury Vehicle Collision
Bicyclist vs. Driver

Bicyclist vs. Driver

  • $50,000
  • County Sacramento

A vehicle driver turned right and struck our client who was on a bicycle. The case settled for the defendant's insurance policy limits.

Personal Injury Vehicle Collision
Scooter Driver vs. Car

Scooter Driver vs. Car

  • $40,000
  • County Alameda

The defendant made a left turn directly in the path of our client who was driving straight ahead on a motor scooter. Our client sustained knee and leg injuries.

Each case is unique and individual results vary. We cannot guarantee any outcome.

Results: Verdicts & Settlements

Since Lamb & Frischer's opening in January 2013, we have obtained over $19,000,000 in judgments settlements for our clients. Click through the slide show below to see a selection verdicts and settlements.



  • Construction Injury Leierer v. Harris Salinas Rebar
  • Product liability Product Liability
  • Personal Injury Personal Injury
  • Elder abuse and wrongful death Patient vs. Grancare, Parkview Healthcare, and Mariner Health Care Management
  • Construction Wrongful Death Construction worker vs. Simile Construction Service
  • Personal Injury Vehicle Collision Fugitive recovery agent vs. Weststar Trucking
  • Medical Malpractice Confidential Medical Malpractice
  • Uninsured Motorist and Bad Faith Driver vs. Progressive Insurance
  • Personal injury vehicle collision Driver vs. driver
  • Personal injury vehicle collision Driver vs. driver
  • Personal injury vehicle collision Driver vs. driver
  • Personal injury vehicle collision Driver vs. driver
  • Personal injury vehicle collision Driver vs. Driver
  • Premises Liability Renter vs. San Francisco landlord
  • Personal injury vehicle collision Driver vs. pedestrian
  • Premises Liability Pedestrian vs. City and County of San Francisco and Land Owner
  • Personal injury vehicle collision Passenger vs. driver
  • Personal injury vehicle collision Driver vs. driver
  • Personal injury vehicle collision Driver vs. pedestrian
  • Dangerous condition of public property / wrongful death Driver vs. Driver and County of Sacramento
  • Personal injury vehicle collision Driver vs. Driver
  • Product Liabilty Customer vs. Urban Skin Solutions
  • Personal Injury Vehicle Collision Bicyclist vs. Driver
  • Personal Injury Vehicle Collision Scooter Driver vs. Car
  • Leierer v. Harris Salinas Rebar

    • $10,700,000.00 verdict

    • County Alameda

    Selected as the Daily Journal's #1 construction injury verdict for 2015.

    Mr. Leierer suffered a construction site back injury. Almost a year later, he suffered a brain injury in a solo car collision. The jury found the auto collision related to his medical care and treatment for the back injury and held subcontractor Harris Salinas Rebar accountable both injuries.

    Read Full Verdict Details
  • Product Liability

    $1,500,000

    Confidential product liability personal injury settlement.

  • Personal Injury

    $795,000

    We represented a family in a confidential wrongful death and negligent infliction of emotional distress settlement. The defendant driver struck and killed an elderly pedestrian while relatives witnessed. When we discovered the driver had impaired vision, yet still drove, the court allowed alleging punitive damages.

  • Patient vs. Grancare, Parkview Healthcare, and Mariner Health Care Management

    • Confidential Settlement
    • County Alameda

  • Construction worker vs. Simile Construction Service

    • $750,000
    • County Fresno

    We represented the family of a drywall installer who died after falling from the defendant's scissor lift, which had its guardrail removed. We represented the worker's two young children and his mother. The defendant claimed our client fell while climbing up the side of the lift, although no one witnessed his fall.

  • Fugitive recovery agent vs. Weststar Trucking

    • $450,000
    • County Stockton

    We represented a good samaritan fugitive recovery agent who was rear-ended by a truck driver while assisting the driver of a broken down car. The collision happened in the early morning on Highway 99 and caused our client neck and wrist injuries.

  • Confidential Medical Malpractice

    $300,000

    Confidential Medical Malpractice Settlement

  • Driver vs. Progressive Insurance

    • 300,000
    • County San Francisco Arbitration

    We represented a single mother suing her own insurance company to recover uninsured motorist benefits owed to her. She was rear-ended by an uninsured driver and suffered a lower back injury.

  • Driver vs. driver

    • $285,000
    • County Marin

    Our client, a travelling nurse, was hit when an oncoming driver made a left turn on a red light, ending her ability to physically perform travelling nurse work. The defendant blamed our client for causing the collision.

  • Driver vs. driver

    • $250,000
    • County San Francisco

    We represented a driver who was rear-ended because the defendant was using his cell phone and driving, and obtained the defendant's insurance policy limit. The San Francisco Superior Court agreed that plaintiff could request punitive damages for texting while driving, making this case one of the first texting-while-driving punitive damage cases.

  • Driver vs. driver

    • $245,000
    • County Marin

    We represented a driver who was struck by an oncoming car while turning left, causing our client shoulder and neck injuries.

  • Driver vs. driver

    • $225,000
    • County San Francisco

    Our client was rear-ended at around 5 mph. However, because she was pivoted in her seat in order to merge into traffic, she sustained a back injury that took her off of work for over a year.

  • Driver vs. Driver

    • $200,000
    • County San Joaquin

    An elderly driver caused a severe collision when attempting to U-turn on a undivided highway, causing our client to suffer an open fracture of the arm. We resolved the case for the policy limits of both the elderly driver and her passenger, alleging that the passenger caused the U-turn.

  • Renter vs. San Francisco landlord

    • $190,000
    • County San Francisco

    A staircase on our client's rental property was severely rotted and collapsed under our client's feet, causing him to fall down the stairs. Our client required shoulder surgery. The landlord contended that our client knew and complained about the collapsing stair and that contended that he had put up warning tape, which our client and witnesses denied.

  • Driver vs. pedestrian

    • $150,000
    • County San Francisco

    A driver struck two clients while making a right turn on a green light, causing foot injuries to one and back injuries to the other.

  • Pedestrian vs. City and County of San Francisco and Land Owner

    • $127,000
    • County San Francisco

    Our client, who suffered from a disability and used dual crutches, fell when his crutch went into a drain with its cover missing. Our client lost his mobility due to a shoulder injury.

  • Passenger vs. driver

    • $100,000
    • County San Benito

    We immediately obtained the insurance policy limits for a farm worker injured when the car he was a passenger in flipped over.

  • Driver vs. driver

    • $97,500
    • County Monterey

    Our client was rear-ended at a stop sign and suffered a back injury. Defendant alleged that our client had a history of back injuries and disability, including falling while repelling from a helicopter.

  • Driver vs. pedestrian

    • $80,000
    • County Monterey

    Our client was walking in a parking lot with a shopping cart when another driver struck her shopping cart. Because our client was disabled and leaning on the shopping cart, the impact injured her by twisting her body.

  • Driver vs. Driver and County of Sacramento

    • $75,000
    • County Sacramento

    Our clients' daughter was struck on the driver's side by a truck in a country road intersection. She instantly succumbed to the collision. The approach to the intersection had a poorly placed stop sign from her direction, while the cross-street had no stop sign. Plaintiffs' received the policy limits of the defendant-driver's insurance, in addition to a settlement with the County. The County continually claimed the stop sign was properly placed, however immediately after settlement, the County moved the stop sign.

  • Driver vs. Driver

    • $65,000
    • County Sonoma

    Our client was injured when the defendant drove 10 mph under the speed limit and merged into the left-most lane, where our client was driving at the speed limit. The defendant claimed she had to merge left to allow a driver to pass her on the right and blamed our client for causing the collision.

  • Customer vs. Urban Skin Solutions

    • $60,000
    • County Alameda

    The defendant created a skin treatment that was sold to our client, which caused permanent skin discoloration.

  • Bicyclist vs. Driver

    • $50,000
    • County Sacramento

    A vehicle driver turned right and struck our client who was on a bicycle. The case settled for the defendant's insurance policy limits.

  • Scooter Driver vs. Car

    • $40,000
    • County Alameda

    The defendant made a left turn directly in the path of our client who was driving straight ahead on a motor scooter. Our client sustained knee and leg injuries.

Each case is unique and individual results vary. We cannot guarantee any outcome.

We Are Here For You

Call us or fill out the form and you will speak with an attorney to consult about your case.